US Lawmakers Renew Controversial Surveillance Tool Despite Concerns

Sat Apr 20 2024
icon-facebook icon-twitter icon-whatsapp

Washington: US lawmakers on Saturday approved the renewal of a powerful electronic surveillance tool, Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), despite criticism from civil liberties organizations over its potential infringement on privacy rights. but criticized by civil liberties organizations.

The bill, which passed in the Senate with a vote of 60-34 shortly after midnight, will be immediately signed into law by President Joe Biden, according to the White House.

Section 702 enables US intelligence agencies to conduct electronic surveillance without the need for a judicial warrant, allowing them to intercept communications, including phone calls and emails, of non-Americans outside of US territory. This includes communications involving US citizens who are in contact with targeted foreigners.

National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan defended the program, stating that it is crucial for detecting national security threats and protecting the United States. However, the renewal of Section 702 has faced criticism from privacy advocates who argue that it undermines constitutional rights to privacy and freedom from unwarranted surveillance.

Former President Donald Trump, who has been vocal in his opposition to the surveillance tool, urged lawmakers to reject its renewal, claiming that it was used against him during his presidential campaign.

The debate over Section 702’s renewal underscores the ongoing tension between national security interests and civil liberties protections. Despite concerns raised by advocacy groups and some lawmakers, the bill garnered enough support to pass both the House and the Senate.

A senior White House official emphasized the importance of renewing the program, citing ongoing conflicts in Gaza and Ukraine, tensions with China, and the persistent threat of cyberattacks. They argued that unilateral disarmament in the realm of surveillance would be risky in the current geopolitical climate.

icon-facebook icon-twitter icon-whatsapp